Home Insurance Articles |
No Bailing Out
Insurers needed to go to the Financial Ombudsman Service for advice after customers who took out insurance during the floods disputed the rejection of their claim which followed. Norwich Union confirmed that it has experienced telephone calls from people who were knee deep in water pleading to buy insurance. 'We think these stories have accounted for some of the cases that have been reported of people saying they cannot get insurance in their area,' says a spokesman. Insurance is still offered in those areas that are affected but not when people are actually in a flood situation. Insurance companies wading through unprecedented numbers of claims are currently having to scrutinize policies taken out at the eleventh hour to check that they are valid. Malcom Tarling, spokesman for the Association of British Insurers says 'No company would offer cover for something already happening'. After all, insurance means covering for something that may happen in the future. Privilege, Churchill and Direct Line - all part of the Royal Bank of Scotland group - have more clients in the flooded regions than any other company. The problem of flooded households trying to purchase last-minute insurance was addressed quickly by the group who immediately enforced a temporary ban on selling insurance to those postcodes where the flooding was located. This ban has now been lifted. A Direct Line spokesman confirmed that there was a temporary rise in people wanting to take out insurance during and directly after the floods and the company was keen to prevent this because customers would not be able to claim for damage which had already happened. Around 25% of people in Britain do not possess home contents insurance, according to the ABI. Hull City Council says this figure is probably higher in many of its postcode districts. Furthermore, Abbey estimates that around 257,000 claims a year are refused because of inadequate insurance cover. Meanwhile, loss assessors, also known as claims management companies, are targeting homeowners in flood hit areas, promising to undertake the insurance claim on their behalf, in return for a fee. Morgan Clark, which says it is the UK's number one flood claims expert, is running an internet advertising campaign and mail-shotting customers in flood-affected areas in a bid to get them to use its service. In just one day after the floods 900 people visited its website, the company claims. Philip Morgan, director of Morgan Clark, says his company takes care of everything. They charge between 4.5 and 10 per cent of the eventual claim that a householder receives. He maintains that the insurance industry is at risk of burning out and when the loss adjusters have all gone, in a few weeks time; people will be left to pick up the pieces. Stephen Reid of Salmon Assessors agrees that people should not be dissuaded by the fee it charges, usually 10 per cent of a claim. 'The most important thing we can alleviate is stress,' he says. 'You wouldn't deal with a court of law without a barrister and you wouldn't deal with the Revenue without an accountant. We're no different. It's all about presentation and getting the right documents together.' Today, claims management companies must be registered with the Financial Services Authority and you should check this if you are thinking of using one of these companies. The Financial Ombudsman Service advises householders to approach such companies with caution because any proportion of the claim value that has to be given away in fees to these companies means the policyholder will not be able to replace everything that has been lost. A spokesman said that surveys undertaken by itself, the ABI and Which? [the consumer organisation] have revealed that claims management companies do not recoup any more money for the customer. If there is a problem with a claim The Financial Ombudsman Service would much prefer to hear from individuals directly.
|